The passing of Dodd-Frank Act under the Obama government came as a blow to banking and financial services industry, especially to e-payday loans online in 2010 after the recession. Because of which the compliance burdens were created which made it difficult for the U.S. companies to compete with the foreign counterparts.

The banking and financial services are all set to benefit from the Trump rule. Finally, there is someone from the business side to look at the financial soundness and implications of the decisions on the business world. The unbelievable victory of Trump over Clinton has resulted in the key branches such as legislative and executive under the Republicans. Democrats and Ex-President Obama were not in favor of few regulations which will now be controlled by Republicans.

As is already known that Trump has been relatively quiet on his plans for banking policy, but he has already mentioned he wants Dodd-Frank act should be dismantled. Also, not only the act but much of the financial regulatory structure could be turned upside down, says Justin Schardin, the director of Bipartisan Policy center. Additionally, a lot of that decision also rests on who would be nominated for vacant positions of Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and Treasury Department.

What is financial regulation plan of Republicans?

Republicans already have a blueprint of the financial policy they would want to follow regardless of the Trump nominees. The mentioned blueprint is Financial Choice Act which seeks to undo many major provisions of Dodd-Frank.

The Director of financial regulation studies at Cato Institute, Mark Calabria is certain that Financial Choice Act will come back in next congress. This act was introduced by Representative Jeb Hensarling, who leads House Financial Services Committee. Calabria says that the bill is as is very comprehensive but some points; including community banking relief could likely pass.

A longtime industry representative who asked not to be named feels that the Financial Choice Act would yield significant benefits for banking. Also, he thinks that the largest financial institutions would get relief with the provisions to repeal the Durbin amendment and Volcker rule.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) funding and structure is likely to be reformed by Hensarling bill. CFPB is frequently lambasted by Republicans to make it less powerful.

Are these the best odds for community banking relief?

Well, Under the Trump leadership community and regional banks have the best odds of regulatory relief. Some prominent banking position holders think so. According to Paul Merski, the executive vice president at Independent Community Bankers of America, having the same party in control of congress as well as White House predicts that community banking relief will get passed. Also, he thinks that there is a better scenario for legislation to move through entire congress and get signed by president into the law.

The similar sentiment is echoed by Senator Mike Crapo heading the powerful Senate Banking Committee. As he hails from Idaho, a state far away from Wall Street, he is widely expected to back the legislation that would benefit smaller institutions.

Additionally, few Democrats including Senator Sherrod Brown from Ohio who is the ranking member on the Senate Banking Committee have embraced the idea of providing regulatory relief for community banks.

All in all future of the banking sector as well as financial services industry seems brighter. It will help the e-payday loans online to compete with their foreign players fairly without the legislative burdens the current financial policy imposes on them.

10260485-fast-payday-loans-guaranteedSome people and organizations out there want to get rid of payday lending companies altogether. These critics consider short term, small dollar loans to be predatory. Other folks simply consider payday loans to be yet another financial product available to provide people with a line of credit. Payday loans can get passionate responses from both sides of the fence, but no matter how you slice it, people should have the right to take out these types of loans in a free society that is based upon capitalism, like ours.

Payday loans were originally created to provide a less stringent financial alternative to help people who are having immediate financial issues, need fast access to money, and may not have access to lending services from mainstream banks and credit companies. People routinely use these types of loans to take care of expenses when they simply don’t have enough money in the bank or on hand to deal with pressing, perhaps unforeseen expenses. The majority of payday lending companies require their customers to have steady income, bank accounts and to be at least 21 years of age. Payday lenders even routinely skip on using Social Security numbers when processing loans. Why is it, then, that so many people are opposed to the payday lending industry?

People who are up on their soapboxes with regards to payday loans often cite that these loans force borrowers to pay very high interest rates and that the loans themselves are just plain predatory in nature. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau released a report in 2014 that stated that 58 percent of all payday loan customers receive government assistance. This fact would almost lead someone to believe that payday loans add to the financial difficulties that these people face, if it weren’t for the other facts that are not being taken into consideration.

unsecured-debt-consolidationWhat these payday loan opponents are not bringing to the table, however, is the fact that people have a very difficult time getting approved for loans. Loan approvals are not only complicated for people with bad credit scores and lower incomes, but they are even hard to get for people who are flush with cash and who have higher credit ratings. The banks have increased the stringency of their approval processes and they have prevented millions of people from getting loans, and made it difficult, at best, for millions of other borrowers. In a nutshell, this increased scrutiny on the part of mainstream lenders has made getting access to emergency cash an impossibility for millions of unbanked and underbanked households in the United States.

Our economy, at its most basic level, is built on the philosophy of supply and demand. In a free market, businesses are created to help fill the demand of customers. Since the late 1990s, the use of payday lenders has increased over 500 percent. This industry now brings in about $50 billion annually. Of course, this just goes to show that the demand is there. Why is it, then, that there are so many government watchdog groups that are hell bent on getting rid of the companies that supply a service to so many people? And doing so under the guise of protecting consumers to boot??

The people who take out payday loans are not doing so blindly. The lenders are not using predatory lending practices. At the end of the day, people need access to money for emergency expenses. If they cannot get this access via mainstream banks, then they need alternatives. The CFPB and federal government simply have no business making it more difficult for these consumers to get access to lines of credit when they need them the most.